ValidPeriod ending 31 Mar 2026Available 22 Oct 2026 · 20:24 UTC
Credit-to-GDP gap (euro area)
History
69 readings.
Showing periods 1–69 of 69 in this date range. Each chart page contains at most 180 original periods; values are not downsampled. All retained snapshot-selected periods are available.
Uses the data available in this saved assessment; later revisions may change historical values. This reconstructed chart does not show what was known on each historical date. Missing source periods break the line; unavailable metric values are omitted. Quality is evaluated at the assessment date.
Exact values · final 12 periods in this chart window
Exact plotted metric readings
Economic period
Value
Unit
Quality
30 Jun 2023
-18
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
30 Sep 2023
-19.1
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Dec 2023
-19.6
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Mar 2024
-20.6
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
30 Jun 2024
-20.1
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
30 Sep 2024
-20
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Dec 2024
-19.5
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Mar 2025
-19.1
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
30 Jun 2025
-18.9
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
30 Sep 2025
-18.7
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Dec 2025
-18.1
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
31 Mar 2026
-17.1
percentage_points_of_gdp
Valid
Method, sources and timing
Economic period & freshness
Calculation uses the latest completed observation available at evaluation time, with its actual economic period and original availability. An older period contributes to assessment only within the configured source-age limit. Newly observed missing or invalid evidence is not replaced with an earlier value. Source status uses economic-age thresholds, not a release calendar; no future release time is inferred.
Source timing diagnostics
Input
Latest source period
Observation age
Available to ECO I
Source status
Xm credit to gdp gap
31 Mar 2026
210 days
22 Oct 2026 · 20:24 UTC
Current
THE PUBLISHED TRANSFORMOutput the latest original published value for its native economic period.
The credit-to-GDP ratio's deviation from its one-sided Hodrick-Prescott trend (smoothing 400,000), in percentage points of GDP. It is the Basel III guide for the countercyclical capital buffer. The trend is estimated from past data only and moves with it; a gap near the start of a series, or after a long boom or bust, is less reliable. Large negative gaps after deleveraging do not mean safety. Above 2 points marks the Basel III buffer guide and above 10 points the historical crisis zone; both are context here, not ECO I rules. Publication trails the quarter by about five to six months; availability is the first retrieval.
Credit to the private non-financial sector and its gap to trend: the best-documented early indicator of financial crises (Basel III buffer guide; Greenwood, Hanson, Shleifer and Sorensen).
Published official-source context; the complete assessment and these supplementary growth/capacity interpretations are not established as calibrated crisis forecasts.
Source: BIS total credit and credit-to-GDP gap statistics; no BIS endorsement. Free statistical reuse with attribution under BIS permitted-use terms. File hashes identify the exact retrieved bytes; these are not historical point-in-time vintages.
Chart source observations · 69 periods in this window
Showing periods 1–69 of 69 in this date range. Each chart page contains at most 180 original periods; values are not downsampled. All retained snapshot-selected periods are available.
Uses snapshot-selected vintages. The final eight exact values in this window are tabulated above. The pinned JSON query provides all matching observations and provenance; follow its cursor for further pages.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. BLS.gov cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from BLS.gov. Data access dates are supplied as retrieved_at in canonical observations. Latest retained BLS access: 03 Oct 2026 · 00:33 UTC. BLS source terms
Source: BIS debt service, credit and credit-gap statistics; debt service is model-based. ECO I's calculations and interpretation are its own; BIS does not endorse them. BIS statistical-use terms